|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周健,徐洪钟.玄武岩纤维土工格栅加筋膨胀土三轴试验[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(05):105-109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2013.05.020]
 ZHOU Jian,XU Hongzhong.Triaxial tests of expansive soil reinforced with basalt fiber geogrid[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION),2013,35(05):105-109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2013.05.020]
点击复制

玄武岩纤维土工格栅加筋膨胀土三轴试验()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7627/CN:32-1670/N]

卷:
35
期数:
2013年05期
页码:
105-109
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Triaxial tests of expansive soil reinforced with basalt fiber geogrid
文章编号:
1671-7627(2013)05-0105-05
作者:
周健12徐洪钟1
1. 南京工业大学 交通学院,江苏 南京 210009; 2. 常州市中元建设工程勘察院有限公司,江苏 常州 213001
Author(s):
ZHOU Jian12XU Hongzhong1
1. College of Transportation Science & Engineering,Nanjing University of Technology,Nanjing 210009,China; 2. Changzhou Zhongyuan Engineering Prospecting Institute Co. Ltd,Changzhou 213001,China
关键词:
玄武岩纤维土工格栅 膨胀土 三轴试验 应力应变特征
Keywords:
basalt fiber geogrid expansive soil triaxial test stress strain characteristics
分类号:
TU443
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2013.05.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用玄武岩纤维双向土工格栅加筋膨胀土,分层压实成直径101 mm、高200 mm的试样,进行加筋与不加筋、饱和与非饱和的膨胀土试样在不同围压下的固结不排水三轴试验,研究其强度特性的变化。结果表明:饱和试样破坏模式表现为塑性破坏,非饱和试样破坏模式表现为偏脆性破坏; 非饱和试样达到峰值强度时的轴向应变(5%以内)明显小于饱和试样(11%左右),同时峰值强度显著增加; 同种加筋类型下,非饱和试样黏聚力远远大于饱和试样,而内摩擦角提高相对较小; 无论饱和试样还是非饱和试样,与未加筋土相比,加筋膨胀土初始屈服应力增大,峰值强度提高,且随加筋层数增多,其提高值增大; 无论饱和试样还是非饱和试样,加筋使膨胀土的内摩擦角略有提高,而黏聚力提高值相对明显。
Abstract:
The expansive soil samples reinforced with basalt fiber geogrid with the size of φ101 mm×200 mm were adopted to carry out a series of CU triaxial tests for reinforced and unreinforced,saturated and unsaturated soil samples under different confining pressures.The strength characteristics of reinforced expansive soil samples were researched.The results showed that the failure mode of saturated soils was the plastic damage and that of unsaturated soil samples was partial brittle failure.The axial strain(less than 5%)of the unsaturated soil sample on peak strength was obviously less than the strain(about 11%)of saturated soils,and there was a significant increase in the peak intensity.With the same types of reinforcement,the cohesion of the unsaturated soil was far greater than that of the saturated soil,and the internal friction angle improvement was relatively small.No matter saturated or not saturated,compared with the unreinforced expansive soil,the initial yield stress and the peak strength increased,and the increment was more evident with more layers of geogrid.No matter saturated or not saturated,the internal friction angle of the reinforced expansive soil was only improved a little,but the cohesion was obvious increased.

参考文献/References:

[1] 郑鹏.南友路膨胀土堑坡稳定性分析与处治技术研究[D].长沙:长沙理工大学,2005.
[2] 聂晓东.土工格栅在膨胀土路堤边坡加固中的应[J].石家庄铁道学院学报:自然科学版,2006,19(5):123-125.
[3] 苏嵌森.应用固化土与加筋土技术治理膨胀土渠道滑坡[J].节水灌溉,2004(5):60-63.
[4] 汪明元,于嫣华,包承纲,等.土工格栅加筋压实膨胀土的强度与变形特性[J].武汉理工大学学报:自然科学版,2009,31(11):88-92.
[5] 徐林荣,凌建明,刘宝琛.土工格栅与膨胀土界面摩擦阻力系数试验研究[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2004,32(2):172-l76.
[6] 汪明元,包承纲,丁金华,等.试验条件对土工格栅与膨胀土界面拉拔性状的影响[J].岩土力学,2008,29(增刊):442-448.
[7] 石名磊,张波.粘土与加筋材料界面作用特性试验研究[J].工业建筑,2005,35(4):50-54.
[8] 张孟喜,闵兴.单层立体加筋砂土性状的三轴试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(8):931-936.
[9] 丁肇钧,张惠明,陈建华,等.非饱和土的抗剪强度与膨胀压力[J].岩土工程学报,1992,14(3):1-8.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-09-07
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41072217)
作者简介:周健(1988—),男,江苏常州人,硕士生,主要研究方向为岩土地下工程; 徐洪钟(联系人),教授,E-mail:hzhxu@163.com..
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-09-07