|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]傅中秋,吉伯海,王满满,等.钢桥面板疲劳热点应力计算模型精度分析[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(01):83-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2016.01.014]
 FU Zhongqiu,JI Bohai,WANG Manman,et al.Analysis on precision of hot spot stress calculation model of steel bridge deck weld fatigue[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION),2016,38(01):83-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2016.01.014]
点击复制

钢桥面板疲劳热点应力计算模型精度分析()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7627/CN:32-1670/N]

卷:
38
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
83-88
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-01-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on precision of hot spot stress calculation model of steel bridge deck weld fatigue
文章编号:
1671-7627(2016)01-0083-06
作者:
傅中秋1吉伯海1王满满1章青2
1.河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098; 2.河海大学 力学与材料学院,江苏 南京 210098
Author(s):
FU Zhongqiu1JI Bohai1WANG Manman1ZHANG Qing 2
1.College of Civil and Transportation Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China; 2.College of Mechanics and Material,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China
关键词:
钢桥面板 疲劳 热点应力 模型精度
Keywords:
steel bridge deck fatigue hot spot stress model precision
分类号:
U441+.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2016.01.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过建立钢桥面板顶板与U肋焊缝分析模型,考虑不同的单元类型和单元划分精度,计算钢桥面板顶板表面及沿厚度方向的应力分布,分析了不同计算模型精度对应力分布规律的影响,并对比不同热点应力取值方法的计算结果。分析表明:应力集中在焊缝边缘位置表面处最明显,当分析模型单元尺寸足够小时,计算结果收敛。对于顶板焊缝数值计算模型,建议采用8节点实体单元计算热点应力时,板厚方向设置不少于8层单元,采用20节点实体单元计算热点应力时,沿板厚方向设置不少于4层单元。对比几种热点应力取值方法计算结果,不同方法热点应力值相差在10%以内,表面外推法计算结果最大,1 mm方法计算结果最小。
Abstract:
The steel deck roof and U-type rib weld analysis model was established to calculate the stress distributions on deck roof surface and in the thickness direction.The element type and the element mesh an different accuracies were considered.The influence of the accuracy of different calculation models to stress distribution was analyzed and hot spot stress results by different calculated methods were compared.It showed that the stress concentration at the edge of the weld surface location was the most obvious.The stress calculation convergence was gained when the model was divided into enough small units.For the details of deck weld,in the thickness direction,more than 8 layer units were adopted when using 8 node solid element in the model,while more than 4 layer units were adopted when using 20 node solid element in the model.From the comparison results,the hot spot stress value by different methods was within 10%.The calculation result from surface extrapolation method was maximum while the calculation result from 1 mm method was the lowest one.

参考文献/References:

[1] 位立强.正交异性钢桥面板焊接构造疲劳性能研究[D].南京:东南大学,2008.
[2] 陈惟珍,ALBRECHT G,KOSTEAS D,等.钢桥焊接构件疲劳寿命预测[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2001,29(1):45.
[3] 吉伯海.我国缆索支承桥梁钢箱梁疲劳损伤研究现状[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(5):410.
[4] HOBBACHER A F.Comparison of different methods of fatigue assessment of a welded aluminium beam[J].Welding in the world,2009,53:154.
[5] HOBBACHER A F.The new IIW recommendations for fatigue assessment of welded joints and components-A comprehensive code recently updated[J].International journal of fatigue,2009,31(1):50.
[6] 彭凡,姚云建,顾勇军,等.热点应力法评定焊接接头疲劳强度的影响因素[J].焊接学报,2010,31(7):83.
[7] 贾法勇,霍立兴,张玉凤,等.热点应力有限元分析的主要影响因素[J].焊接学报,2003,24(3):27.
[8] 吉伯海,田圆,傅中秋,等.正交异性钢桥面板横隔板切口疲劳应力幅分析[J].工业建筑,2014,(5):128.
[9] HOBBACHER A F.Fatigue design of welded joints and components[M].Cambridge:Abington publishing,1996.
[10] NIEMI E,TONSKANEN P.Hot spot stress determination for welded edge gussets[J].Welding in the world,2000,44(5):31.
[11] ヤサムオル,山田健太郎,石川敏之,et al.デッキプレートとUリブの溶接ビードを貫通する疲労き裂の耐久性評価[J].鋼構造論文集,2009,16(64):11.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙幸龙,王新生.疲劳对HK——40炉管蠕变裂纹扩展的影响[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),1987,9(01):81.
 Sun Xinlong Wang Xinsheng.The Influence of Fatigue on Creep Crack Growth in Hk—40 Reformer Tubes[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION),1987,9(01):81.
[2]曾昭景,戴树和.16MnR钢表面裂纹的疲劳扩展[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),1993,15(01):1.
 Zeng Zhaojing Dai Shuhe (Department of Mechanical Engineering).FATIGUE PROPAGATION OF SURFACE CRACK IN 16MnR STEEL[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION),1993,15(01):1.
[3]史慧媛,刘伟庆,方海.复合材料夹层结构的疲劳损伤性能[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(05):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2017.05.001]
 SHI Huiyuan,LIU Weiqing,FANG Hai.Fatigue damage behavior of composite sandwich structure[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION),2017,39(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2017.05.001]
[4]陈波,温卫东,孙煦泽,等.三维编织碳/碳复合材料高温力学及疲劳试验研究[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,40(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2018.01.002]
 CHEN Bo,WEN Weidong,SUN Xuze,et al.Experimental investigation on fatigue of 3D braided C/C composites at high temperatures[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION),2018,40(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2018.01.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-10-29
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51278166,51478163); 高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2015B17414)
作者简介:傅中秋(1983—),男,江苏南京人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为钢桥维护,E-mail:fumidaut@163.com.
引用本文:傅中秋,吉伯海,王满满,等.钢桥面板疲劳热点应力计算模型精度分析[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(1):83-88..
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-20